In case you haven't read my previous post about garter stitch, I'll summarize it here. Garter stitch has a 2:1 proportion of rows : stitches. So if you knit a piece of garter stitch 40 rows tall and 20 stitches wide, it will be perfectly square, perfectly flat, and will look exactly the same on both sides. Knitting each row gives you a ridge. So if you knit two rows, you get two ridges, one on the front, and one on the back. Taking it a little further, if you knit 40 rows, you'll have 20 ridges on the front, and 20 ridges on the back.
So the effect I am trying to replicate is getting InDesign to make wavy lines where the number of waves equals the number of lines, with just a little bit of space in between. The trick is getting this to fit perfectly inside of a square frame.
The above photo shows the effect I'm trying to replicate. After a bit of trial and error (and admittedly a few months of wondering how and if it could be done), I finally stumbled upon the solution. It is Teacup PatternMaker. The solution is deceivingly simple, and I've had the capability for quite some time and didn't even realize it.
In case you're not familiar with PatternMaker, it's a very cool plugin that generates customizable postscript patterns on the fly, right inside of InDesign. As an attendee of the InDesign Secrets Live 2010 Print and ePublishing Conference, I was thrilled to receive the entire Pattern Pack as part of what I'll call my digital gift bag. I am fascinated by geometric patterns, so this Pattern Pack was like an early Christmas present.
And case you're wondering what the little red rectangle is at the top left corner of my pattern, that's FrameReporter, by Rorohiko. It gives little snippets of information about the selected frame...and happens to be one of my favorite plugins.
More articles on InDesign and Knitting coming soon!
Kelly, I sent a link to this post to David and the Teacup software people. You know that PatternMaker is David's baby? He worked w/Teacup to create an InDesign plug-in for postscript patterns. David is going to plotz ;-)
ReplyDeleteAM
Awesome, thanks! I was going to mention him in my tweet, but I'm kind of new to tweeting, so I guess I was feeling a little shy... And hey, I just learned a new word: plotz. Thanks! http://tinyurl.com/42l68c
ReplyDelete